[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Possible explanations for a large hop in latency
- Subject: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency
- From: bep at whack.org (Bruce Pinsky)
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:55:00 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAAAIgYgvPVlNSJZFmGlF6V4QAQAAAAA=@iname.com> <[email protected]> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAADITExNqeCRQanyeEND0whSAQAAAAA=@iname.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sam Stickland wrote:
| Even if they are decrementing TTL inside of their MPLS core, the TTL
| expired message still has to traverse the entire MPLS LSP (tunnel), so
| the latency reported for each "hop" is in fact the latency of the last
| hop in the MPLS network. Always.
|
And who said tunneling protocols aren't fun :-)
- --
=========
bep
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIavwUE1XcgMgrtyYRArGuAJwJa3g/BiIDqNL1L1lItDu+BL3b/ACeMrPT
DtiH+THvgfPz31MAK2QmsZ4=
=m5il
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----