[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy)

Subject: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy)
From: dot at dotat.at (Tony Finch)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:53:53 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected].> <C73D4AA72CC6AA98DE759333@robs-dt> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, David Conrad wrote:
>
> I could maybe see a problem with ".LOCAL" due to mdns or llmnr or ".1"
> due to the risk of someone registering "127.0.0.1"

RFC 1123 section 2.1 says TLDs can't be purely numeric.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER. SLIGHT OR MODERATE BECOMING ROUGH.
THUNDERY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.

References:
- DNS and potential energy
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (James Hess)
- TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy)
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)

Prev by Date: DNS and potential energy
Next by Date: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
Previous by thread: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy)
Next by thread: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread