[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN?

Subject: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN?
From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:08:00 +0530
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Gadi Evron <ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
> 2. On a different note, why is anyone still accepting their route
> announcements? I know some among us re-route RBN traffic to protect users.
> Do you see this as a valid solution for your networks?
>
> What ASNs belong to Atrivo, anyway?

The ASNs you ask about - as per the report - are on pages 4..8 of
http://hostexploit.com/downloads/Atrivo%20white%20paper%20082808ac.pdf

References:
- Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN?
  - From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)

Prev by Date: Using 32 bit ASN numbers
Next by Date: Using 32 bit ASN numbers
Previous by thread: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN?
Next by thread: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread