Brian Shields <[email protected]> wrote:
> That said, the WBA would like to engage with the IETF to address the issues
> as well as provide support to push some of the current IETF capport
That sounds exciting.
What we really need is more involvment from captive portal operators,
and more document review so that we can progress. We have some involvement
From smartphone OS vendors already, but things work best when we can have
people writing code engage with the documents.
> activities to practical trials. The WBA next event will be in Frankfurt on
> Oct 2-3, and we would be glad to invite a IETF delegation to discuss a way
> forward on the joint collaboration and potentially trials kick-off.
So, the IETF is not a single entity, so it's hard to invite "us"
You may find this useful --- https://www.ietf.org/about/participate/tao/
> A few of us are planning to join the capport IETF 105 session virtually and
> look forward to engaging with everyone there. Thanks very much.
Cool.
> Brian Shields
> VP, Engineering at Boingo
> Project Lead, Captive Network Portal Standards for Wi-Fi Workgroup, WBA
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Alternatives:
> ----------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature