(long overdue update) There having been no dissent, objections, or concerns raised consensus is that the group would like to adopt this document. Please re-upload draft-larose-capport-architecture-01 as draft-ietf-capport-architecture-00. Thanks! On 30 August 2017 at 20:03, Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > As indicated in the minutes from Prague > [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a > general hum in favor of the architecture document: > > """ > 1. for arch doc, do we want a milestone for architecture. Humming: in favor. > 2. is the document a good basis for the milestone? Humming: in favor. > """ > > This email is to initiate a two week adoption call for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-larose-capport-architecture/ > > Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague. > > Thanks, > -Erik
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature