[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed

To: David Bird <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed
From: Erik Kline <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 22:15:46 +0900
Archived-at: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/zPBjn1QgPALXxWSSh3_gQH-DUcQ>
Authentication-results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Cc: [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qv8Fj+RQxpwVGUD4rB3fyEpiUTEND+gyfLFyF1Umk5E=; b=VBb/dDfQusruS5bvSFcizyU9tyP7zHTeGv8rsgfi8046CqysAIJYMTZ1Dn3o+QkWkm 3/9vmBM5AkTC4/7IRFDwMuhpD4it49yLZMgf4JiWN2NIqVYXItt70wwuUlElfw3H8wzY MvG2jysZtYd6/Jk9uYyUiFj6ixMW2wCu3uRC37GHkUE3MYacA2RdULzITGfOodaA0ajJ 2wtLxJR/wbozgMyP1NUzqjwl7g1GQ2Gtkj8MJ6RodxIWEPahPDs5aEibbYcGPuWQEqVZ jAwJyp4dK6VUvXKAIhN05p3ahd+bnFetyF0ZRm8SktYnmZPYjjNTdrWGmDXru2MhUZy1 TzKA==
In-reply-to: <CADo9JyVdUG5EjcOtZnTn+MPGpgY+Zim8FE9vzMoWNsw+7qqp7Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CADo9JyVdUG5EjcOtZnTn+MPGpgY+Zim8FE9vzMoWNsw+7qqp7Q@mail.gmail.com>

Do the architectural elements in the capport-architecture draft accurately capture "captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed"?

I have no experience with which to easily distinguish between elements that are present and common in existing implementations and those that exist in the draft solely for the purpose of meeting the proposed solution behaviour outlined in section 3.

On 14 April 2017 at 21:37, David Bird <[email protected]> wrote:

Can we get back on track and focus on our goal of improving the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed?

_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>

References:
- [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed
Next by Date: Re: [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed
Previous by thread: [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed
Next by thread: Re: [Captive-portals] Improve the user experience of captive portals as they're commonly understood and currently deployed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread