[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"

To: Martin J. Dürst <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
From: David Bird <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 05:08:04 -0700
Archived-at: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/R7I_U6M9s6qGNK-nk5WkaFYcyyk>
Authentication-results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Cc: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>, Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hVDjviQd+fI6T2L+mBvWehdLsF9O0nNlwyXWzkpZEKU=; b=e3Z35V9A87jSuOfSs6DTrkuvt8Dg5ZSSkNxG7uJbjK4kH3eP4RBh5Z6Yn65xJnl03i 8YQGkK2QkS2fB0o2uNijRFN/tpYHQx2blrBBi9CZeOSww1BUVDgPDEkzhzkqFyisOY+B 93LlAAiS3ZyiDUFUcvEMVNyb/IvKcsc+65ffXScMKJOA9K2DZjm1E3kZoi3JkW8XWal0 bAvLGGSUzbEmyB/GOxuVOPxSYH7J1HEkgVehFq+moTH1/Qo27eCTbRFc4SbDzPs6F6KA Rjb5orvZ5UH5fan92cFQrmxhhUzH+5Jl5WXV5/fGTzb76FI93Kdy0TYLkkuILrVgFV/t CE/g==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CADo9JyU2wiEBB4L7ADSybt9se7jCN764JSEoHuGTcuiU_jDscQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CADo9JyVr07w5GRpF+UzSBHRuo=V=3p9MeyhFdzB+5pZk7_amNw@mail.gmail.com> <D76BBBCF97F57144BB5FCF08007244A77059CE49@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <CADo9JyUnOfXSfXufzSk=QajyG2KXQfKzmQayca1kitRoAuwsqg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CADo9JyXPUPLU4aKueT7HxTU1CYfY=HrhqRz0OcCu4z1AivP-hg@mail.gmail.com> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9870579488@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <[email protected]> <CADo9JyW3r7QzKsW78EuM9FOqW1waYGzjfuD7iTdWBXAR4eY8qQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXA7PM65=20YNzziLR6Gv7ZpuSWvo0gHWt7aRdzAWr2bQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Indeed :)

To be clear, Gmail hyperlinked boingo.com for me... but, the point is that the UE/capport detection parsed and validated (checked the cert and cert status) of the FQDN. It is not some URL with questionable formatting...

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Martin J. Dürst <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2017/04/07 12:46, Martin Thomson wrote:

On 7 April 2017 at 10:44, David Bird <[email protected]> wrote:

the more familiar "boingo.com" in the FQDN

You mean boıngo.com ? Looks legit.

Turkish users will spot the problem easily :-).

Regards, Martin.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>

References:
- [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Kyle Larose <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Christian Saunders <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Dave Dolson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
  - From: Martin J. Dürst <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
Next by Date: Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
Previous by thread: Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
Next by thread: Re: [Captive-portals] Arguments against (any) Capport "API"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread