Well, we can wish, but I don't know that it will feedback to the right place.
Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2 April 2017 at 17:27, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> One of the things we are going to need to do is to find a way use the
>> stick as well as the carrot when it comes to poorly behaved sites.
> The big stick I see here is the increased use of HTTPS. Do we really
> need anything more?
(On my laptop, I open a disposable firefox profile (without HTTPS
everywhere), and I have to find some site that has an http redirect. I can
usually depend upon my city's web site to be clueless.
That's a lot of effort and I'm technically clueful. The Freehand Chicago had
all these problems, plus their DNS was intolerant of AAAA requests.)
So I don't see HTTPS as fixing or shaming any portals; rather I just see
users getting frustrated and going someplace else without knowing why.
They don't call support; and if they do, support will ask them to "turn it
off and on", and to please try IE6.
What they might do is write a review, and this is where I think we need to do
something.
_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals