Re: [Captive-portals] Not good....

To: David Bird <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Not good....

From: mariko kobayashi <[email protected]>

Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 18:56:03 +0900

Archived-at: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/nHQIF8-BN3wRR8cuYaS3z1Fnmnw>

Cc: [email protected]

Delivered-to: [email protected]

In-reply-to: <CADo9JyWemG4ZEzELkK9+v6ouFY2ZG=iaT+r-gySO4MPNU-YpjQ@mail.gmail.com>

List-archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>

List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>

List-id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>

List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>

List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

References: <CADo9JyVEeNkcAu32LQGA0SatAj2Su-YB5QuP9KDXQx+VS8mHaQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CADo9JyWemG4ZEzELkK9+v6ouFY2ZG=iaT+r-gySO4MPNU-YpjQ@mail.gmail.com>

User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

+1
I know some other strange behaviors of capport and very interested in the idea.
If we can define their common problems, reasons and solutions, it will be helpful output for some people.
My survey can also includes some contents related to "poor captive portal."

Mariko

On 2017/04/03 7:53, David Bird wrote:

Great idea. This list is also a good place to document a current state of things (?) - and IETF travels will see it all!

Disclaimers: While I recommend Wireshark for troubleshooting, and things like pcap files are valuable for reference and debugging, please do not post anything containing PII to the mailing list (or to anyone, delete it!).

On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:

David Bird <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wi-Fi at Chicago O'Hare Airport defeating Chome captive portal check.
> They also require using their DHCP assigned DNS (why don't they just
> DNAT DNS to their server, I don't know -- chilli will do that :)

One of the things we are going to need to do is to find a way use the
stick as well as the carrot when it comes to poorly behaved sites.

This requires that we have running code and RFCs to form the carrot first.
But, we do need a place to record the problems we and others see with
captive portals that there out there. It would be lovely if we could
get one or more social media travel sites to introduce categories for
"poor captive portal" in their reviews.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals

-- 
------------------------------------------------⭐︎

　Mariko Kobayashi([email protected])
　Keio Univ. SFC B4
  Jun Murai Lab./WIDE/ao(あお)
　
---------------------------⭐︎