[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00

To: Paul Ebersman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
From: David Bird <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:00:32 -0800
Archived-at: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/ZtswP0v7LxivggzCoKKyZp9jHcY>
Authentication-results: ietfc.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Mark Nottingham <[email protected]>, Martin Thomson <[email protected]>, Dave Dolson <[email protected]>
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=rB1oUUy47fljMHlvWzBQqftjuV18hVLKDGEEgHDbbM0=; b=jCXuDNrwbu5AupP9HaBfeWpvhEgnfK9CZ5w5RP8IBNY0EphVdhbPQDLyZmjYCFH5Ul oV2JDLvUFIFUZkxhQY79JJ69Stmho155sI8h83guW4w3tuE053fNe3FK1v7yg1fCpvEl tJDffokluwdr8iJREPTsaPmdK9OER1nH0j63VceZT75pqrUzD+n8Z+EUFmGEzdGF3oul 4vw2hYB74Hw63a1QE9G5hXQfsDt899zGFdYQPJlzBnlro57TZqe4n3ISDLHk8fOEzgOO sH0s7KFDYPSXeCqrg9gGHTSePf7JvS3kRbT+E3epTxDHFmiz2JJhXNDXBhtNCE+9ZOY1 lwTA==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <D2FCEB47.12A6DC%[email protected]> <CABkgnnV-Nbbt3Mkh-ZOzWig7rJX32SFugkWLnx-t94bA-B__Lw@mail.gmail.com> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9830EBCAE6@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com> <D3030A8C.12AEFF%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

+1 for an ICMP solution ... https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach-00

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Paul Ebersman <[email protected]> wrote:

ddolson> Regarding non-browser clients, even non-HTTP clients, and
ddolson> considering this is the IETF, it seems reasonable to find an
ddolson> IP-layer solution vs. an HTTP-layer solution.

Indeed... All sorts of phone apps don't use HTTP but need to tickle the
reaction.

_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>

References:
- [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: "Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: Dave Dolson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: "Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: Paul Ebersman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Next by Date: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Previous by thread: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Next by thread: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread