[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] Ben Campbell's Yes on charter-ietf-capport-00-01: (with COMMENT)



Hi,

On a slight tangent, I would like to mention that most client computers are now capable of using IPv6,
with many preferring it because e.g. Facebook reportedly loads 15% faster.

Hopefully, sometime, some networks managed by Captive Portals will become dual-stack.

Lets not set the standard for all future captive portal networks to be IPv4-only forever.
Hopefully, it may even be possible for clients to operate IPv6-only if they choose.

Suggested text:
insert after "- allow endpoints to learn about the parameters of their confinement,"
---
- allow endpoints to learn about and interact with the Captive Portal over IPv6,
  and allow endpoints to access the IPv6 Internet,
---

Thanks,
    John


On 16 October 2015 at 13:04, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry just a typo correction and maybe too late for the comments but
> eduroam should not be eduRoam but eduroam.
>
> It would be great if this typo could be fixed.

And so it is.
Thanks for pointing it out.

Barry

_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals