[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Captive-portals] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on charter-ietf-capport-00-01: (with COMMENT)
That proposed text seems good to me...
W
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Joel Jaeggli has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-capport-00-01: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-capport/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Might consider a block on this but it's readily addressed.
>
> A stretch-goal / phase 2 work may attempt to solve this problem
> for devices that have no human interaction (such as "IoT" devices).
>
> Rather than presuppose what might be in a future charter I would simply
> include this as a potential issue.
>
> one probably bad proposal is:
>
> A secondary goal is to look at the problem posed to or by devices that
> have little or no recourse to human interaction.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
---maf