[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Captive-portals] Alternative authentication mechanism to meet captive portal needs?



Hi all,
Apologies if this is a silly question (and if I missed it in the archives). Has anyone (anywhere) considered if there's a new (EAP?) authentication mechanism that would meet at least some of the needs of deployers of captive portals? eg allow users to agree to an acceptable use policy, see a logo, and enter their email address?

I know its potentially a bigger change than some of the others suggested, but if these requirements aren't going anywhere, it might be worth the long-term investment.

David