[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LLVM 9 Switches to a Less Free License
- Subject: LLVM 9 Switches to a Less Free License
- From: zen at freedbms.net (Zenaan Harkness)
- Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:51:42 +1000
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2_wkmF5FF2vsj=b_SGyZ=hRE-niffsWPqha44DwON2fEw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD2Ti2_wkmF5FF2vsj=b_SGyZ=hRE-niffsWPqha44DwON2fEw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:36:06AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21018675
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
> https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD
> https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-April/112300.html
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/8.x/clang/LICENSE.TXT
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/9.x/clang/LICENSE.TXT
Is "Apache 2.0 with LLVM Exceptions" creating per-project
balkanization?
Why was Apache 2.0 license insufficient?