[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google bias exposed...
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:39 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Sure looks like you are defending Google now.
except, if you go back to a message I wrote a couple of days ago, I made it pretty clear that I don't need any 'software' telling me that google-NSA-GCHQ is just a propaganda outlet for "american govcorp".
If you still think I'm defending google, I'll add that all of google's "key people" should be beaten to death. Along with trumpo.
> Old saying from a 1970 poster:"If it's the truth, what does it matter who said it?"
> These days, any given story gets re-covered by a spectrum of news outlets. Â If you are dissatisfied with one, you may look for others...Ooops! Â Until Google itself starts censoring some, even many sources.Â
Of course. I've no doubt that's how google works. And I don't need any automated system to teach me that.
> https://youtu.be/m3RVo67b9Ck
> Does "punk" realize that YouTube, owned by Google, took down the Gennai video, to keep people from learning what she said?
heh - again - why would google-NSA-GCHQ NOT do that? I mean, everybody with half a brain should by now know what google is?
by the way here's the biased original source
https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whistle-exec-reveals-google-plan-to-prevent-trump-situation-in-2020-on-hidden-cam/
Anyway, I am still curious, how do you envision a system that detects 'bias' in political propaganda...?