[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PCR: “It's open season on ZenNazi”
>
> Which matters enough that Jews are fleeing, and have largely fled, France.
>
nonsense. Your anti-muslim, pro-jew-kristian-nazis rants get tiring - and are wholly irrelevant.
> > The problem with your views is that you as a racist want to
> > explain politics in terms of 'race'. Note that of course there's no
> > Jewish race. Jewism is just a pseudo culture.
>
> Jews vote on their ethnicity, not on their economic class.
more highly stupid nonsense. According to wikimierda there are 6 millions (HAHA!) jews in the american cesspool. So let's say 3 million jew voters. Completely IRRELEVANT figure.
And fuck the jews anyway. Hopefully the fact that jew non-culture is murderous supremacist garbage has been made clear enough.
>
> > > > And if, not what 'race' do you think they belong to?
>
> > > What matters is not what race I think they belong to, but what race they
> > > think they belong to.
>
> > there's no jew race.
>
> Persuade them of that.
fuck them. Jewism is a theocratic supremacist mafioso club. Not. A. Race.
>
> > So at this point, I have to rhetorically ask, what class do you think you belong to?
>
> Reactionaries don't believe in the Marxist class analysis, neither did
> Lysander Spooner, whom you claim to be an adherent of.
sonny, I don't subscribe to the marxist 'class analysis'. I subscribe to the LIBERTARIAN class analysis that piece of shit jew marx PLAGIARIZED.
here's ONE of the only TWO decent articles that narcho fascist outlet mises.org has
https://mises.org/library/classical-liberal-roots-marxist-doctrine-classes
educate your-self.
>
> The reactionary class categorization is priests (including professors,
> the mainstream media, public intellectuals, lawyers, judges, etc)
> warriors (including officers, soldiers, police, rentacops, mercs, etc)
> merchants (capitalists, entrepeneurs, businessmen, and such) and the masses.
>
> In which categorization I am primarily a merchant, trying out for the
> priesthood. But I spend more time on merchant stuff.
you are either a member of the govcorp mafia (and you probably are), or else you're poor and a victim of the crimes commited by govcorp.
So yeah, I'll assume you're an americunt govcorp criminal. As a matter of fact your fascist propaganda makes you a moral accomplice of them, even if you're not stealing, torturing and killing like your americunt govcorp officers do.
>
> > And what are your political beliefs? The only reason I ask is
> > because the very first author that shows up on jim.com is
> > Lysander Spooner, but, YOU NEVER READ A WORD HE WROTE.
>
> You interpret Lysander Spooner as a commie. I interpret him otherwise.
I don't 'interpret' him as a commie, and I'm not a commie either.
You as a fascist clown are the obvious commie. Any retard who gets the A of the ABC of political theory knows that trumpist totalitarianism IS practical communism. Look at the 18 TRILLIONS bank bailout. That's communism.
So I stand by what I said : you NEVER read a SINGLE WORD that spooner wrote.
https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/spooner-a-plan-for-the-abolition-of-slavery-and-to-the-non-slaveholders-of-the-south-1858
Educate yourself. That's spooner who correctly wanted to make piece-of-shit slave owners pay for their crimes. Such a commie.
> Something like anarchocapitalism worked in saga period Iceland
LMAO! You are an ignoramus parroting the garbage that fascist jew friedman invented. Iceland was a SLAVE SOCIETY at that time and run by FUCKING PIRATES. THE THIEVING, MURDERING VIKINGS.
But hey, maybe that's as far as your 'understanding' of 'freedom' goes.
> because
> it was a state enforced theocracy,
Just read the nonsense you write. Iceland was 'anarchistic', THEOCRATIC and state enforced. Get a dictionary.
> I have therefore come to the conclusion that the best system is a long
> established and stable monarchy,
So, change your piece of shit website to reflect your Newfound High Knowledge.
> > > ...And so we get a ruling elite that fails to hold together.
>
> > And why is that a problem for LIBERTARIANS?
>
> One King three thousand miles is a lesser problem than a thousand kings
> three miles away. The loss of cohesion in the ruling elite leads to
> anarcho tyranny, not anarcho capitalism. Yesterday I was trying to
> transfer a sum of money while avoiding tax impact, and one bank thought
> the legalities worked one way, and the other bank thought the legalities
> worked a different way, and they could not agree because the laws and
> regulations are complicated, intrusive, obscure, incomprehensible, there
> is no one who actually knows what that mean, except that no matter what
> you do, if they want to charge you with something, they will probably
> find something to charge you with.
yes, that's how statism works. It has nothing to do with 'democracy'.
>
> > > > .... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.4
>
> > > Right and left were defined in the FrenchRevolution.
>
> > And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it.
>
> What the french left supported in place of monarchy, feudalism, and
> theocracy
By the way, do you know that the americunt 'revolution' and the french revolution were basically the same scam? With more than a few of the same clowns involved in both, and the french monarchy bankrolling the americunts? OOPS.
So what's your take on the americunt 'revolution'? I guess you DON"T support it, so you are moving BACK TO ENGLAND?
If you are a monarchist you must realize that the americunt government is illegitimate and the king of england the rightful owner of the 'land' and the people in it.
>
> > So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are
> > a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
>
>
> I want liberty.
No you don't. And answer the question. Why does your piece of shit site mention libertarians and pseudo libertarians instead of CHRISTIAN MONARCHISTS.