latest false flag attack?

[juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)]

On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:19:47 +1000
jamesd at echeque.com wrote:

> On 2018-09-18 07:56, juan wrote:
> > It doesnt' matter because you know, there was no "major conflagration"
> 
> Nuts.

	yes, your pentagon fairy tale is.

	There was no major conflagration. There was a fire in a few floors and the black smoke indicated that they were low temperature fires. 

	And no, less smoke doesn't necessarily imply more oxygen like Peter said. It's more sensible to assume that the fuel just burned at low temperature and less smoke simply meant less fuel burning...because, you know, it was consumed.

	Also, I'm still waiting for Peter to link the 'design documents" saying that the towers would collapse after "3 hours" of "fire".