[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
An IBM computer debates humans, and wins...
- Subject: An IBM computer debates humans, and wins...
- From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:30:55 -0300
- In-reply-to: <CAG2tMp6JBPN0+P3mBk=RcgBLC=dfdbSr6Yyyh=Bne81+iwt0uw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAG2tMp74Pwh-ktTKHDjzZ=3oMFnD3wfQu0x_DE_=_7VUm+7DnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG2tMp6JBPN0+P3mBk=RcgBLC=dfdbSr6Yyyh=Bne81+iwt0uw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:04:01 -0300
Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com> wrote:
> Computers beat humans at chess in 1997, beat humans at Jeopardy in 2011,
> and beat the world's best Go players in 2017. This Monday, a computer won a
> far more nuanced competition: debate.
sorry let me rephrase :
> a computer won
so what does that mean? What are the implications of that particular piece of fake news, and glaringly absurd 'fact'? Why is the fake-news-meme 'computer won debate' being pushed? What's the 'tactic and strategy' behind this round of psychological warfare?