Actually useful license terms

[ryacko at gmail.com (Ryan Carboni)]

+if a critical security bug is found and unpatched in excess of 6 months
from the time the bug was first communicated, the software is unsupported
+when software becomes constructively unsupported, the source code is
either released, or sufficient documentation must be provided to reverse
engineer a patch of any code with a critical vulnerability
+no non-disclosure agreement for any software bug can be allowed more than
9 months.
+A notice must be displayed from where a compiled program is downloaded
from or extracted from that includes this code that states the amount of
money the licensee donated to this project.

obviously a lawyer can make it less ambiguous, but the idea is clear

no one will adopt this because they value monkey behaviors over
accomplishing things or their principles
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 909 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20180129/11d89d5f/attachment.txt>