[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AFRICAN HISTORY MONTH
- Subject: AFRICAN HISTORY MONTH
- From: jnn at synfin.org (John Newman)
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 00:06:29 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On February 16, 2018 11:58:20 AM EST, g2s <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:
>First off, the only reason I even saw this is because John replied to
>this pinhead.
Yeah I made a mistake getting caught up in my spam box.
I am done with Jim. Who, hilariously, actually seems to
think he is a phrenologist - I fucking knew it!
>To wit, the pinhead wrote:
>> Walk down the street. You will notice that black Americans generally
>have smaller heads, reflecting smaller brains..
>You'd have to be a moron ... ie. Pinhead, to actually believe that. My
>large jewish nose (sic) can smell the stench of this human shitpile all
>the way across cyberspace.
>Rr
>
>-------- Original message --------From: John Newman <jnn at synfin.org>
>Date: 2/15/18 8:27 PM (GMT-08:00) To: jamesd at echeque.com Cc:
>cypherpunks at lists.cpunks.org Subject: Re: AFRICAN HISTORY MONTH
>
>
>> On Feb 12, 2018, at 4:00 PM, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/02/2018 11:21, John Newman wrote:
>>> Are you being purposely disingenuous? There were obviously also
>raiding parties and
>>> the sale of â??prisoners of warâ?? between and within different black
>Africans themselves,
>>
>> Dramatic, but atypical.
>>
>> Enslavement on the basis of war was generally result of pacification
>campaigns, rather than "slave raids" - kings enslaved those who were
>persistently causing them trouble, with the objective of deterring
>troublemakers and getting rid of them. As, for example, the Irish.
>>
>> And most enslavement was not on the basis of war. It was more
>typically for petty theft, particularly stealing from one's employer,
>and vagrancy. (Not having visible means of support.)
>>
>>> divisions exploited by European slavers anxious to fill the gaping
>maw hungry for free
>>> labor to subsidize the colonization and exploitation of the â??new
>worldâ??.
>>
>> Slavery was driven by supply, rather than demand. It was a way of
>dealing with problem people. And Africa had, and still has, more
>problem people.
>>
>
>
>You are so full of shit. Conversation with scum like yourself is
>utterly pointless.
>Slavery was driven by a SLAVE ECONOMY, which was obviously driven by
>demand.
>Do you actually believe the bullshit you spout?
>
>
>> Walk down the street. You will notice that black Americans generally
>have smaller heads, reflecting smaller brains. Thus require more
>supervision, and are less apt to voluntarily accept supervision.
>>
>> People who need supervision, and are disinclined to accept it, cause
>problems. Slavery was a way of dealing with those problems.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20180217/856abc77/attachment.sig>