[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models

Subject: God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 01:08:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAMyHXXcJtmRTgY1qF3he2L6d8jN1jSKPKoZ=KeeDGvC7zP9w4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2Ti2_2mqvxEwEVBZ8c5OLLqRqXfD=LqxVJLOUXnUzzM_eK1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMyHXXdZKuODh2acr7MKBZSEnc9BH4hKvVwUB6EGzkw-1SD0_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti2-w0iSQjPmrC4kDJPBLuNi0ds-ceH4239fEg725vNryRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMyHXXcJtmRTgY1qF3he2L6d8jN1jSKPKoZ=KeeDGvC7zP9w4w@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/30/18, Steven Schear <schear.steve at gmail.com> wrote:
> fully OS CPUs and SoCs
> (including the pre-boot code which is still proprietary for even otherwise
> open designs)

No, if the CPUs were truly open, proprietary boot code
would be completely mooted just write your own to spec.
Only stupid sheep and order takers would continue using
closed shit.

Yes there are no truly open CPUs, nor open Fabs, that's the problem.
It's easily fixable, and extremely profitable for the first players to do it.

Follow-Ups:
- God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
  - From: schear.steve at gmail.com (Steven Schear)

References:
- God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
  - From: schear.steve at gmail.com (Steven Schear)
- God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
  - From: schear.steve at gmail.com (Steven Schear)

Prev by Date: God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
Next by Date: I am a criminal
Previous by thread: God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
Next by thread: God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread