[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

Subject: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
From: mirimir at riseup.net (Mirimir)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 11:58:01 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti28PaTX=Vr34DcdSaUpFCVRQdAMN9PYE-rGNdLHfAeSvVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti2-La4E5Z39mR1T4wYHz282xUTwCr5b=DUZPOHcZSiaVJQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti28PaTX=Vr34DcdSaUpFCVRQdAMN9PYE-rGNdLHfAeSvVw@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/15/2018 10:58 AM, grarpamp wrote:

<SNIP>

> b) The masses, again being anonymous and widespread, are
> therefore simply not targetable...

So why couldn't AP fund a nuclear strike?

<SNIP>

Follow-Ups:
- Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)

References:
- Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
  - From: jdb10987 at yahoo.com (jim bell)
- Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
  - From: jnn at synfin.org (John Newman)
- Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
  - From: jnn at synfin.org (John Newman)
- Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)

Prev by Date: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
Next by Date: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
Previous by thread: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
Next by thread: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread