[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do

Subject: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:18:34 -0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti29Ht4FhhgiCsEKnQirYaGHvrKQA6N4ocGYw=YQxPqe_-w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:06:54 -0700
Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:


> 
> Yep, he's lost it, for sure :(


	schneier is a fucking fraud like the rest of the tor
	'community'  - that includes anynonymous coward mirimir of
	course

	hell, the whole pentagon funded 'hacking' 'community' is a
	fraud. Only the americunts can manage that sort of industrial
	scale fraud. 








> 
> <SNIP>

Follow-Ups:
- [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
  - From: sswalow at gmail.com (swalow swalow)

References:
- Fwd: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Fwd: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
  - From: mirimir at riseup.net (Mirimir)

Prev by Date: Fwd: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
Next by Date: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
Previous by thread: Fwd: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
Next by thread: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread