[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance

Subject: Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance
From: eugen at leitl.org (Eugen Leitl)
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:42:51 +0000
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2-n2x+F_DU5B_Lb_a8UpUbkf1ti7gh2eycm=pRKzDtE2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2Ti2-GosBLqsR-NC-frcG+X68h+3AW9JuNm+oesJRQ=xn44Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti2-n2x+F_DU5B_Lb_a8UpUbkf1ti7gh2eycm=pRKzDtE2w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45:50AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> https://arstechnica.com/security/2016/08/building-a-new-tor-that-withstands-next-generation-state-surveillance/
> 
> Forgot to put the link above.

Anyone here able to evaluate the merits of the proposed new architectures? 
Or do we have to wait for the proof after pudding is served?

Follow-Ups:
- Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance
  - From: schear.steve at gmail.com (Steven Schear)
- Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)

References:
- Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)

Prev by Date: Google’s Artificial Intelligence Getting ‘Greedy,’ ‘Aggressive’
Next by Date: Google???s Artificial Intelligence Getting ???Greedy,??? ???Aggressive???
Previous by thread: Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance
Next by thread: Building a new Tor that can resist next-generation state surveillance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread