[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google’s Artificial Intelligence Getting ‘Greedy,’ ‘Aggressive’
- Subject: Re: Google’s Artificial Intelligence Getting ‘Greedy,’ ‘Aggressive’
- From: jnn at synfin.org (John Newman)
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:26:13 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2-ghSuWRm=725kauUeDvGbYhyGvLK85piDZ04kq_jTFQg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti2_iGpDfjrmJiPpA3f_xM8N6C3X8uzGa8dprn-Cy=CP9vw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti2-ghSuWRm=725kauUeDvGbYhyGvLK85piDZ04kq_jTFQg@mail.gmail.com>
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:11 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:05 AM, John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:
>> There's always the 3 laws of robotics ;)
>>
>> Nick Bostrom doesn't seem to think it will be that easy of course. His "Superintelligence" book is an interesting look at the problem. He's far more pessimistic and i think realistic than Ray Kurtzweil and some other "singularity" hypes..
>
> Is man in the likeness of god?
> And if so, or if not, then what is man's AI / bot in the likeness of?
> Does this become circular?
Man is in the likeness of a chimpanzee ;)
A super intelligent AI would be more in the likeness of "God" (up until now just a fairy tale) than anything that has come before. I don't think it's circular, it's progressive.