Twitter working on identifying permanently suspended users...

[zen at freedbms.net (Zenaan Harkness)]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:45:00AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
> 
> 
>  From: Razer <g2s at riseup.net>
>  On 02/12/2017 05:16 PM, jim bell wrote:
>    
>       From: Razer <g2s at riseup.net>
>    
>    >>>Accounts created specifically to harass. But they aren't saying how: 
>   >>>Â https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety 
>   >>> Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  ...and no one writing it up seems to know either
>   
>   >>What I want to know, is: Â What is their definition of the word, "harass"? >>Contradict? Â Disprove? Â Argue against? Â Make unhappy? Â  
>   >>Is Twitter going to adopt a consistent policy that political statements aren't allowed? Â  >> Jim Bell
> 
> >Ask @Support or @jack. Maybe they can tell you.
>  
> >I would guess it's what their policy always was. If you think their policy is 'inconsistent' that's because it depends on who gets harassment complaints against them that are verifiable.
> But I'm still waiting for a  definition of "harassment".  Do you have your own?


"Razzer's gone wild" - definitions for the modern man:
   harassment  -  marketing / propaganda
   fascist     -  marketing / propaganda
   tolerant    -  marketing / propaganda
   liberal     -  marketing / propaganda
   inclusive   -  marketing / propaganda