[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: [NATURAL_DEFENCE] Fight the Surveillance State on Local Level
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Fwd: [NATURAL_DEFENCE] Fight the Surveillance State on Local Level
- From: mirimir at riseup.net (Mirimir)
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:39:05 -0600
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti29_Jsr8wuQuxLkaL+v0ManKGvaUfi1Jn+=rh4MsJsSF=Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti29_Jsr8wuQuxLkaL+v0ManKGvaUfi1Jn+=rh4MsJsSF=Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/27/2016 07:55 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ECOTERRA Intl. <office at ecoterra-international.org>
> Date: Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:13 AM
> Subject: [NATURAL_DEFENCE] Fight the Surveillance State on Local Level
> To: MAILHUB <mailhub at ecoterra.net>
>
>
>
> USAmerican Nationwide Effort Launched to
> Fight the Surveillance State on Local Level
>
> September 21, 2016
>
> By Derrick Broze (*)
>
> A coalition of seventeen organizations has launched an effort to
> combat the growing Surveillance State by supporting accountability
> measures in eleven cities across the United States.
>
> On Wednesday, the American Civil Liberties Union and a coalition of
> sixteen other civil liberties and technology firms announced the
> beginning of a national effort to combat the growth of secretive
> surveillance technology. The coalitionâ??s aim is to â??stop the
> unchecked, secret, and too often discriminatory use of surveillance
> technologies by local police and to move their approval process out of
> the darkness and into the light.â??
For sure, citizens need surveillance of police surveillance. In the US,
that should be feasible. As long as "national defense" isn't invoked ;)
<SNIP>