[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF
- From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:35:48 -0300
- In-reply-to: <167276127e089e476d02d784cc9adc75.webmail@localhost>
- References: <[email protected]> <76ed6b0ffe4125ab2f46848f012da0bf.webmail@localhost> <[email protected]> <7f6544265c1184845174104166841d68.webmail@localhost> <[email protected]> <158bdfb465d17d9f6865046e6512bb25.webmail@localhost> <[email protected]> <167276127e089e476d02d784cc9adc75.webmail@localhost>
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:22:44 -0000
xorcist at sigaint.org wrote:
> I remember when this list had posts from Assange and others on actual
> cryptographic techniques and tools,
So, how effective have your crypto techniques and tools been
against the state?
And what is stoping you from discussing crypto? Rhetorical
question of course. The answer is, you and others can discuss
whatever you want and ignore whatever posters you want to
ignore. It's not like the list has a 100kb quota per day that's
all being used up by 'off topic' posts.
> does ANYONE on cypherpunks need to be convinced of the abuses of
> power?
Is that supposed to mean : only 'abuses' of power are a
problem, not power per se? I've seen a fair amount of
people in this list trying to 'argue' that government is
great as long as 'we the right people' are in power. In turn I
could ask, how can ANYONE on cypherpunks pretend that ANY
government can be a legitimate institution.
> where real information was
> shared. New information and ideas.
"Don't get me wrong", I would love to have secure computing and
telecom platforms, but it's painfully obvious that in the last
20 years we've moved in the exact opposite direction. Now the
hardware comes compromised. "out of the box". And that's not
because of off-topic posts to the cpunks mailing list.
>
> Now its just wankers speculating, and regurgitating links from open
> news sources.. and you act like you're leaking privileged information.
>
> lulz
>