[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mail, please.
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Mail, please.
- From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:19:59 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20160913035904.GL7460@x220-a02>
- References: <163dce6f023905ff5fc3552c12f41b81.squirrel@_> <CAD2Ti2_Pf+ffXeX=P-JBAUzFeJutmzpoJn4XxmxfXoWgn76H1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160913035904.GL7460@x220-a02>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
> per email
> downloading, without any pipelining
Think about that for a while.
> but technically
> optional.
As before, the whole paragraph was optional for simple use[r]s.
> I still find mbox "folders" substantially quicker, even with an SSD.
> I expect notmuch-mutt will remove that particular block to using
> Maildir
The app is largely separate to mbox vs maildir on fs comparisons.
> and loop mounted Maildir hierarchy in a single (zip compressed)
> file
Someone likes corruption.
> would handle my objection to the storage bloat
The content is the same size. Most users weren't born on
unix and thus don't grok inode love, management, and etre.
> that or ZFS of
> course.
You wouldn't like it, it's not that 'quick' and loves RAM which
isn't 'minimal'.
> Ditch fetchmail already.
For now, not happening.
My next tool survey is at least a year and devel time away.
I gave one set, others gave others, use whatever you like,
there's more than one use case and way.