[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
foundations for sanity
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: foundations for sanity
- From: rayzer at riseup.net (Razer)
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 20:09:07 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20160905024310.GS25772@x220-a02>
- References: <20160903050621.GA28274@x220-a02> <20160905024310.GS25772@x220-a02>
On 09/04/2016 07:43 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> - respect for the freedom, inherent dignity, rights and sovereignty of
>> every human
>> Although we may 'punish' or otherwise un-sanction our fellow society
>> dwellers who enage in activities in ways which fail to demonstrate
>> reasonable consideration for the safety of others, we shall limit our
>> collective enforcement to not include activities which infringe no soul
>> other than the individual soul himself.
>
> Punishment by 'peers' must also be decided by peers, not just the guilt
> of a peer, and the penalties or punishments ought be proportionate
> between cases and between crimes.
>
Welp!(says the heretic) Whose going to regulate 'proportionate punishment'?
Rr