[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Suggestion to list admins for warning/disclaimer on the web for new subscribers
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Suggestion to list admins for warning/disclaimer on the web for new subscribers
- From: gbnewby at pglaf.org (Greg Newby)
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 10:33:11 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20160903113112.GD25772@x220-a02>
- References: <[email protected]$> <20160903113112.GD25772@x220-a02>
Dear Zenaan, Georgi:
Good suggestions, thanks! I edited the list public HTML based on what's below, and also the nice Pastebin article that was posted here recently.
https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo
- Greg
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 09:31:12PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:23:48PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> > The wikipedia page on cypherpunks have nothing to do with the current
> > state of this list. History gets rewritten (from experience).
> >
> > I suggest after list discussion the list admins to put a warning on the
> > list web page. Something along the lines of (clearly needs rewriting):
> >
> > ====
> > The list is not it used to be and has nothing to do with the wikipedia
> > page.
> >
> > The list has spooks, paid trolls, other similar whores and possibly
> > crackpots.
> >
> > Some of them post actively, others rarely.
> >
> > Their motivation might include:
> > * social engineering
> > * manipulating opinions
> > * profiting from the past reputation of the term cypherpunk
> > * killing the list
> >
> > "What You See is NOT What You Get"
> >
> > Use common sense when reading or posting to the list.
> > ====
>
> Excellent suggestion - full disclosure and pre-forewarning is highly
> recommended. We have a duty of care to newcomers to make sure they don't
> get involved in anything they might want to not get involved in, and
> they ought be suitably forewarned :)