[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Continual Violation of List Charter
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Continual Violation of List Charter
- From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 20:42:07 -0300
- In-reply-to: <CAGRDzQWMVbEJ0-kW8GAC52v=g9-pMdW6jQFuiJqyj4n8np8DaA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD2Ti2-ZwYessbREO5L=6Zo9cH94KcO2m2sZh96P_dbL241a+A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAGRDzQW4wcX5ao6=conz+dv0xpENcVA7Wb+5z3b8Tg36f8s1zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGRDzQWMVbEJ0-kW8GAC52v=g9-pMdW6jQFuiJqyj4n8np8DaA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 01:29:23 +0300
Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why are you fucks trying to kill a listserv ? ... because you are
> fascists the topic of fascism is brought to the list by you enacting
> fascist tendencies ... should we ban the topic of fascism ? lets ban
> you and any admin because that is fascist ... if you dont want to be
> wholly part of the list you can set your little gadget to edit out
> the sad parts for you ... or dont you little fascist pussies know how
> to use technology ?
Yeah, it seems slightly ironic that in a list of masters of
hacking such as this, some people apparently don't know how to
filter their mail...
>
> On Sep 4, 2016 5:35 AM, "juan" <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:14:13 -0700
> "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
>
> > On 9/3/16 1:30 PM, juan wrote:
> > > On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:41:52 -0400
> > > grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> [1]
> > >> "The Cypherpunks mailing list is a mailing list for discussing
> > >> cryptography and its effect on society."
> > > incomplete, and you didn't even provide a 'source'
> > >
> > > plus, it's obvious that you haven't read the 1992 - ~1998
> > > archives of the list.
> >
> > Archives? We read it in real time.
>
>
> Who - the fuck - is we. My message was addressed to grarpamp.
> I bet he didn't read it in real time.
>
>
> >
> > If it isn't directly about the access to or effects of cryptography
> > and related security practices, it is off topic.
>