[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bitcoin Unable To Provide Privacy, Attracts FED and IRS Heat, FinServices Cave Demands
- Subject: Bitcoin Unable To Provide Privacy, Attracts FED and IRS Heat, FinServices Cave Demands
- From: mirimir at riseup.net (Mirimir)
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:19:30 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti29tddF+OzdOKb5Mnjayu9iD-Lf=SucomNMu-tE6h4_GpQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD2Ti28YfgT58zby3ohPttvLAW=RjDvCLry=UekwWVz7LsXP7w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti29tddF+OzdOKb5Mnjayu9iD-Lf=SucomNMu-tE6h4_GpQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/21/2016 07:31 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:32 AM, John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:
>> Gotta tumble those coins !
>
> The degree of unlinkability achievable with bitcoin
> tumbling is not as high as people might think.
> Lots of papers on that.
One mix isn't enough. Mixing too much at one go is pointless. It's the
snake eating a pig issue. And you need to mix at least three times,
using different mixing services, among different wallets. I like using
Whonix instances, because they're easy to setup, and can be considered
disposable.
> Plus other hurdles...
> - Exchanges ... logs, fees, account locking (theft)
Don't use them :)
> - Tumblers... logs, fees, risk of theft
I've never suffered from theft.
http://foggeddriztrcar2.onion
http://bitmixer2whesjgj.onion
http://grams7enufi7jmdl.onion/helix
> - Joinmarket, the only operational, p2p, self contained
> in network method, in existance... has some issues too.
So does it work well as a mixer?
I'll check it out.