[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Censors: We want Real-News, Real-Names, Real-ID, Real-Censorship
- Subject: Censors: We want Real-News, Real-Names, Real-ID, Real-Censorship
- From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:56:39 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAD2Ti2_2Ms5c7Y1+0ajnEv4LQtsNXtJgw=OxQ3h43hDEJNPT+g@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti2_pApOv+=hDD6d3e0jyoMzVkXize_pWbomUJSLDdS0Zjg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:48 PM, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Blame the MSM.
I blame them, but more specifically the profiteering corporations
buying up all the media and wringing every last nickel out.
Journalists can't live on four pennies, and a quality genuine
newsroom sure as shit can't. The elite don't want quality
independance, they want a subservient megaphone.
You can't find a good rag or tv hour or investigation anymore.
What existed basically turned into a useless tweetstream
for instant ratings discovery and advertising. Thanks to buyers
buying out. These same buyers and power structures above/below
them flexing the real-* over you, so heavy in their media how
could anyone think any other possibility exists, let alone is
good.
Clinton? If a public servant needs a mail system they
should go high ground in public and ask the public for one.
Fuck corruption, sneaky shady secret shit, and her.