[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

A look into the past



http://web.archive.org/web/20161101183101/https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/05/14/a-few-thoughts-on-cellular-encryption/


Clementeâ??s claim generated lots of healthy skepticism. This isnâ??t because
> the project is technically infeasible (the numbers mostly add up
> <http://web.archive.org/web/20161101183101/http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/05/is_the_us_gover.html>),
> or because thereâ??s no precedent for warrantless wiretapping
> <http://web.archive.org/web/20161101183101/https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/presskit/ATT_onepager.pdf>.
> To me the most convincing objection was simple: *itâ??d be hard to keep
> secret.* *Mostly for boring phone company reasons.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A (2006)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Merrill


Too many blatantly ignorant people with PhDs.

Truely there is grade inflation.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2199 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20161101/900b4d81/attachment.txt>