[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 that police may use evidence found in illegal stops.
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-3 that police may use evidence found in illegal stops.
- From: [email protected] (Kurt Buff)
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:31:30 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti28=F2L=9myUO82GwYd7xzDErZGvr7UV8z7mXUCszpKFpA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20160625145054.GD6268@x220-a02> <CAD2Ti28=F2L=9myUO82GwYd7xzDErZGvr7UV8z7mXUCszpKFpA@mail.gmail.com>
"The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow.
The come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by
erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and
constant retreat on the other - until the day when they are suddenly
declared to be the country's official ideology." -Ayn Rand
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:29 AM, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/25/16, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote:
>> http://www.dailydot.com/politics/supreme-court-justice-search-arrest-warrant/?tw=dd
>
> http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1373_83i7.pdf
>
> As before... torpedoing their Constitution.
>
> Keep on twisting the words and phrases, especially
> at Common Law, a little more here, a little more there,
> and so the garrot turns. Maybe they'll an hero by 2076.
> After all, 300 years... plenty time to either get it right or gtfo.