[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
the challenge of becoming an anarchist - why nearly everyone's a statist
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: the challenge of becoming an anarchist - why nearly everyone's a statist
- From: [email protected] (eden)
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:07:23 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CADy1Ce51fj3wX=xtXhthSQkg8XGA9xCCHNW6e7ZoNUEXm0qxcA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20160612033341.GA5679@x220-a02> <CADy1Ce51fj3wX=xtXhthSQkg8XGA9xCCHNW6e7ZoNUEXm0qxcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anarchism is hard for some people to differentiate from nihilism.
I agree.
> Try reading Lysander Spooner, Benjamin Tucker, Ludwig von Mises and,
> most especially, Murray Rothbard. Maybe a bit of David Friedman, too.
>
> Once you've made your way through their works, you can call yourself
> educated in anarchism.
>
> Ignore Emma Goldman, the various Russian anarchist, the
> anarcho-syndicalists, etc. - they aren't serious.
Are you serious?
Von MISES? How would you distinguish between Anarchism and
Libertarianism (and nihilism)?
--
eden