[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Once again: Tor timing attacks and a Tor confession
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Once again: Tor timing attacks and a Tor confession
- From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
- Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:06:43 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2_+348bjcA5eaNrqvECU45=eJPspu0xhPdj4hntuP0cHQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]$> <CAD2Ti2_+348bjcA5eaNrqvECU45=eJPspu0xhPdj4hntuP0cHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 04:58:14AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> > At [2] Tor (and/or DoD) confess:
>
> These quote active attacks.
>
> >> The Tor design doesn't try to protect against an attacker who can see
> >> or measure both traffic going into the Tor network and also traffic
> >> coming out of the Tor network.
>
> "Timing", "seeing", and "measuring" are passive attacks.
>
I meant the quoted text, which is passive.
> There is a difference.
Even if active attack is needed, does it matter
with what buzzword I am deanonimized?