[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cryptome] (no subject)
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: [cryptome] (no subject)
- From: [email protected] (juan)
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:26:59 -0300
- In-reply-to: <CANFTA0_74A6AWWGpuVJde6aR=U6shnnw8ppTAJHGMpob4TFVvQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CANFTA0_74A6AWWGpuVJde6aR=U6shnnw8ppTAJHGMpob4TFVvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:09:51 -0500
Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... Being able to hack something doesn't mean there's a backdoor,
> even if you're the one who built it. Hacking != backdoors
Of course it does. 'Hacking' here means taking advantage of
some 'bug' you are responsible for.
It turns out then that the definitions of 'bug' 'backdoor'
'hacking' and 'working for the government' get nicely blurred.
Awfully convenient for the likes of apple and the likes of you.
'plausible deniability' and all that shit.
> Good soundbite, though.
Dude.
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:10 AM, John Young <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If Apple can hack its own security then the products are backdoors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>