[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Let's play Whack-A-Troll
- Subject: Let's play Whack-A-Troll
- From: me03w at riseup.net (me03w at riseup.net)
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:50:54 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <20161205014026.GI9734@x220-a02> <20161212111425.GA11956@x220-a02> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On 2016-12-12 18:00, Razer wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 09:18 AM, me03w at riseup.net wrote:
> What works like a charm on radio (CB/Ham) works on the internet. Not
> replying to inflammatory posts period no matter the email address is
> more functional than simply ignoring email addresses and nicks, which
> are subject to change.
I agree.
> That's the way it works on the radio.
Interesting.
> You don't
> care what handle 'the jerk' is using, you just ignore 'the jerk'.
Yes.
> Eventually they shut up. Even if they lurk.
That would be a pleasant outcome. Perhaps radio is more personal?
> Admittedly I'm a violator of that rule of shunning trolls occasionally,
> but I subscribe to this list because of my interest in Cybersecurity
> for
> individuals, any individual anywhere, and some parties, EVEN THOUGH
> THEY
> SEEM TO HAVE the technical skills, are using this list as a 'litterbox'
> to 'shit' in.
Litterbox. Exactly.
> I believe it's intentional and targeted because it seemed
> to begin in earnest after most people on the list essentially supported
> @ioerror when he was institutionally slandered by a few individuals at
> TorProject. There's an agenda behind the people posting crap here...
> and
> it's not related to the crap they post.
I had not noticed the correlation. Of course, that doesn't prove
causation, but it is something to keep in mind.
- pussy cat signature here