oil supply sigint

[juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)]

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 01:44:57 -0500
grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:


> 
> Oil, Gas, and Coal are on path to near irrelavancy within
> 25 years max. The plants will be shrink wrapped and
> preserved for any future need, with a few left running
> as research labs.
> Simply because Solar, Wind, and Nuke are taking over,
> no one wants the soot and carbon in the atmosphere,
> no one wants the external geopolitical dependencies,

	nuke is worse than oil and has the same 'geopolitical
	dependencies'.


> and no one wants to bet on shit that will run out.
> Especially when an equivalent investment is
> essentially clean, cheap, and free, forever.
> Solar has reached an efficiency now where it pays to
> build the giant fabs and literally start printing energy
> for free from sand.

	"print energy for free" is obvious nonsense. Have you bothered
	looking at the real numbers? Amount of energy that reaches a
	particular place, efficiency and COST of the system to collect
	it?