On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:40:43AM -0600, Mirimir wrote: > I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is > fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries. > Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be > vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better? Agreed. As I read it, this is not Tor fork, just the browser, right?