[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist

To: Georgi Guninski <[email protected]>
Subject: Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist
From: [email protected] (coderman)
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:51:51 -0700
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]$>
References: <[email protected]$> <[email protected]> <CAJVRA1RUUdzgO61HCuYvfyK6+05T=2FTyhSUBAw6G8n-AOvhNQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJVRA1SzVkZFyCed30FRx=vtO0ESf_e5dZEgFmV91T=Y4s0NBg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]$>

On 9/1/15, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> it appears nothing is safe, and the effort is trivial to modest. #infosec
>>
>
> That was my point.

what's funny is this leads to security advantage through obscurity,
where the bespoke solutions break off-the-shelf exploitation
techniques.

this delay between failed attempt and success, or simply failed
attempt and plan B, used to provide early warning and feedback.

what a world we live in!

best regards,

Follow-Ups:
- Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist
  - From: [email protected] ([email protected])

References:
- Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist
  - From: [email protected] (Blibbet)
- Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist
  - From: [email protected] (coderman)
- Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist
  - From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)

Prev by Date: Article by me on B. Brown transcript
Next by Date: [tor-relays] clarification on what Utah State University exit relays store ("360 gigs of log files")
Previous by thread: Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist
Next by thread: Linux Foundation' Linux workstation security checklist
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread