[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The BlackList
- To: coderman <[email protected]>
- Subject: The BlackList
- From: [email protected] (jim bell)
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 01:42:42 +0000 (UTC)
- Cc: cpunks <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1RNQcEoROR17KpRS=MG5pWqibmVd_AYHakV-Ue5y8JXyQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJVRA1RNQcEoROR17KpRS=MG5pWqibmVd_AYHakV-Ue5y8JXyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: coderman <[email protected]>
To: jim bell <[email protected]>
Cc: Cari Machet <[email protected]>; cpunks <[email protected]>
On 10/31/15, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
>>Â Â I also solved David Friedman's "Hard problem", see his book, "The
>> Machinery of Freedom", the previously-assumed difficulty or impossibility
>> of providing for the defense of a fully libertarian or anarchistic society.
>i'd support AP with a basic income in place. otherwise, the few
>outliers could out leverage even the most widely prevalent crowd
>dispositions...
>basic income + assassination politics == awesome future!**[ **this conjecture remains to be proven... ]
This sounds like a contradiction in terms.  "basic income" implies that somebody is forced to provide somebody else an income.  Someone using force is anathemato AP:  Anyone feeling such force can use AP to act against those doing that forcing.  Forcing stops.  "Basic income" stops.    Jim Bell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151101/3fe3a649/attachment.html>