[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

WHY make a fake GCHQ slide?

To: Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]>
Subject: WHY make a fake GCHQ slide?
From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:31:44 +0300
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <CAHWD2rLuKm9_ha7LwRS4RQzkbCt6DfdMi8JDfDUGmfOqKx2wCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANFTA0-DN1XRUNc=xhEw3X2r=6MsOn30f-uobhkq98zUJPSqkA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]$> <CAHWD2rLuKm9_ha7LwRS4RQzkbCt6DfdMi8JDfDUGmfOqKx2wCw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:25:59PM +0200, Lodewijk andrÃ© de la porte wrote:
> German court couldn't have been able to determine the slides real,
> therefore must treat them false for the purpose of proof. Doesn't mean
> they're actually fake, it's just not certain enough that they're real.

Indeed, not finding a rootkit doesn't necessarily mean there is none.

IIRC recently read (probably from Snownden) that LEAs can remotely
control smart?phones with SMSs.

In addition even if they find rootkit on a phone, attributing it to NSA
is highly non-trivial.

References:
- WHY make a fake GCHQ slide?
  - From: [email protected] (Michael Best)
- WHY make a fake GCHQ slide?
  - From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
- WHY make a fake GCHQ slide?
  - From: [email protected] (Lodewijk andré de la porte)

Prev by Date: [cryptome] Re: [cryptome]
Next by Date: [cryptome] Re: [cryptome]
Previous by thread: WHY make a fake GCHQ slide?
Next by thread: WHY make a fake GCHQ slide?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread