[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
- From: [email protected] (Mirimir)
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:38:09 -0600
- In-reply-to: <CAKtE3zd45tgzqW+wvJG0=9TnnXoZfR-eejAgWN3qPtm1=oPmDw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <trinity-731b0262-b3be-4de0-8d9f-731ae2425bf0-1444583318602@3capp-mailcom-lxa16> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAKtE3zd45tgzqW+wvJG0=9TnnXoZfR-eejAgWN3qPtm1=oPmDw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
> A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug*
Well, there are the access logs ;)
It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but better
than nothing. In my opinion.
Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think.
> Travis
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But yes,
>>> that would explain it.
>>
>> Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the others
>> despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else
>> secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>