[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?

To: Michael Best <[email protected]>, cpunks <[email protected]>
Subject: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
From: [email protected] (Razer)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:33:26 -0700
In-reply-to: <CANFTA09SE-Q4uy1tgwZZdROrtXq2i3DUjSG1bubf1nFBZfnfMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANFTA09SE-Q4uy1tgwZZdROrtXq2i3DUjSG1bubf1nFBZfnfMw@mail.gmail.com>

Nervous laugh...

On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote:
>
>     I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or
>     any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial
>     motivation
>     as redistributor.
>
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151010/42fb7e24/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151010/42fb7e24/attachment.sig>

Follow-Ups:
- Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
  - From: [email protected] (Michael Best)

References:
- Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
  - From: [email protected] (Michael Best)

Prev by Date: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
Next by Date: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
Previous by thread: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
Next by thread: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread