[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
Ok i read it all see no fucking ask of this community for help on the matter
I am not interested in purity coffins for cryptome or anyone but i am
interested in respect of community as others have stated here
There are issues then there are deeper concerns re structural mindset ...
base shit people love to ignore so they can fuck with shit on accounta
Coming to the list with a question is not what occured here - coming to the
list with an ask is not what occured
This space is not cut throat dont pretend
On Oct 10, 2015 8:50 AM, "grarpamp" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Steve Kinney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That amounts to less than an ant fart in a tornado, in context?
>
> I am having difficulty quantifying this ratio.
> Can you supply some peer reviewed research data?
> Preferably as compared to "needle in a haystack"
> or "flatter than Kansas".
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151010/1f571371/attachment.html>