[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 01:37:12 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAKtE3zeBzNRbzxyE-AiTVLZ18gxCrkg8iQv7wH8Cg=ipDdyaiw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANFTA0_rUNWVZ8jN=+=vPbQ2f+iTrRx6x1uZB+h61pKO56tXuw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]$> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAKtE3zeBzNRbzxyE-AiTVLZ18gxCrkg8iQv7wH8Cg=ipDdyaiw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Travis Biehn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Who cares about cryptome keeping server logs? If you're worried about
> showing up in logs then you ought to be using TAILS. JYAs logs are just less
> accurate copies of what the TLAs, his hosting provider, their upstream
> peers, the guys on the lower floor at the PX & the memory scrapers implanted
> on his server already keep.

 +1 for truth. Beware hosters, ISP's, and cables.

References:
- The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
  - From: [email protected] (Michael Best)
- The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
  - From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
- The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
  - From: [email protected] (Shelley)
- The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
  - From: [email protected] (John Young)
- The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
  - From: [email protected] (Travis Biehn)

Prev by Date: [cryptome] Re: [cryptome]
Next by Date: The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
Previous by thread: The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
Next by thread: The GCHQ Cryptome slide could be a mockup/disinfo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread