[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Jim Bell vindicated

To: rysiek <[email protected]>
Subject: Jim Bell vindicated
From: [email protected] (Robert Hettinga)
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 13:35:45 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <3828630.GhPtQj6AOs@lapuntu>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <3828630.GhPtQj6AOs@lapuntu>

> On May 6, 2015, at 11:10 AM, rysiek <[email protected]> displayed his own Gramscian damage thusly:
> 
> Let me comment thusly:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcvd5JZkUXY

Right. And nothing is new. I cite *novel* stuff in every occurrence, outlining actual human *progress*, and you go all relativistic and say theyâ??re derivative. Fine. Derivative of what, exactly? What was the Roman lateen sail derivative of if there had not been a triangular sail before, for instance.

What is Zenoâ??s paradox, say, derivative of? The Pythagorean theorem? Heroâ??s steam turbine?

There *is* an arrow to progress. It is measurable. The arrow of islamic culture points in completely the opposite direction. The leftâ??s anti-western urge to annihilate progress, and thus humanity, is striking in its tenacity.

It is evil.

Cheers,
RAH

Follow-Ups:
- Jim Bell vindicated
  - From: [email protected] (Cathal (Phone))
- Jim Bell vindicated
  - From: [email protected] (Razer)

References:
- Jim Bell vindicated
  - From: [email protected] (Seth)
- Jim Bell vindicated
  - From: [email protected] (John Young)
- Jim Bell vindicated
  - From: [email protected] (Robert Hettinga)
- Jim Bell vindicated
  - From: [email protected] (rysiek)

Prev by Date: Jim Bell vindicated
Next by Date: Jim Bell vindicated
Previous by thread: Jim Bell vindicated
Next by thread: Jim Bell vindicated
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread